PMT NPL Financing 2015-1 v. Lee et al
| PMT NPL Financing 2015-1 |
| Thomas C. Lee and Other Unknown Occupants of 1111 - 148th NE Avenue, Bellevue, WA 98007 |
| 2:2018cv00358 |
| March 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| XX US, Outside District |
| John C Coughenour |
| Rent, Lease, and Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER. This Court FINDS Defendants to be vexatious litigants. The Court ORDERS that Defendants SEEK and OBTAIN this Court's formal written permission before removing this lawsuit to federal court. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file any future removal petitions by Defendants under this case number. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) (cc: Thomas Lee via first class mail)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER remanding this matter to the King County Superior Court; directing Clerk to immediately transfer this case to state court. Within 21 days from the date of this order Defendant shall SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not impose a bar order. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT) cc: Defendant via USPS
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER granting plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; recommending review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
