Aguilar-Valencia v. United States of America
| Enrique Aguilar-Valencia |
| United States of America |
| 2:2018cv00359 |
| March 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| XX US, Outside District |
| John C Coughenour |
| Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER on Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Dkt. No. 1 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice. Mr. Aguilar-Valencia's request for an evidentiary hearing and a certificate of appealability are DENIED. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
20
MINUTE ORDER re Petitioner's 19 Letter. Defense Counsel is ORDERED to obtain and file an English translation of Petitioner's letter. The translation shall be completed by a court-certified interpreter and filed no later than November 2, 2018. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting Government's 13 Motion to Seal Exhibit D and PSR. The Clerk is DIRECTED to maintain Document Numbers 14 -1 and 14 -2 under seal. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting Petitioner's unopposed 15 Motion for Extension of Time to file reply to Government's 12 response to Petitioner's 2255 motion. Petitioner's reply due 10/22/2018. Clerk is directed to note 1 Petitioner's 2255 motion for 10/22/2018. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER re United States' 9 Amended Motion for Limited Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
10
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 8 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer to Petitioner's 2255 MOTION. Respondent shall file and serve its answer to Petitioner's Section 2255 Motion no later than July 23, 2018. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting Petitioner's 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Furthermore, the Court ORDERS that within forty-five days after service, the United States shall file and serve an Answer. The Clerk is DIRECTED to refer this matter to the Criminal Justice Act Panel Coordinator for appointment of counsel. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour.(TH) (cc: Petitioner via first class mail)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Aguilar-Valencia v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Enrique Aguilar-Valencia | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Steven Masada(Designation Assistant US Attorney) |
| Represented By: | US Attorney Habeas(Designation Assistant US Attorney) |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
