Emmanuel et al v. King County et al
| Keith Emmanuel, Richard Homchick and Charles Peters |
| King County, City of Bellevue, John Urquhart, Daniel Satterberg, Steven Mylett and John Does 1-10 |
| 2:2018cv00377 |
| March 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| James L. Robart |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 101 Motion to Re-Tax Costs. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (LH)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER granting Defendants' 61 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot Defendants' 85 Motion motion to supplement the summary judgment record. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER granting Parties' 86 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Discovery completed by 8/17/2020. Signed by Judge James L. Robart.(LH)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER re Plaintiff Richard Homchick's 59 Motion to Compel. The court court STRIKES Mr. Homchick's motion (Dkt. # 59 ) without prejudice to renewing the motion in a manner that comports with the court's scheduling order. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 67 Motion to File Over-length Brief in support of his Opposition to Defendants' 61 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER re parties' 54 Joint Stipulated Motion to File Second Amended Complaint. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 15, Plaintiff shall file and serve the amended pleading on all parties within fourteen (14) days of the filing of the Order. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
50
PROTECTIVE ORDER re parties' 49 Stipulation. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
43
STIPULATION AND ORDER dismissing with prejudice all claims against City of Bellevue and Chief Mylett re parties' 42 Stipulated Motion. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT) (City of Bellevue and Steven Mylett terminated.)
|
|
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER dismissing claims by plaintiffs Keith Emmanuel and Charles Peters re parties' 35 Stipulation, by Judge James L. Robart. (SWT)(Keith Emmanuel and Charles Peters terminated.)
|
|
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER regarding Initial Disclosures re parties' 33 Stipulation. The deadline for exchanging initial disclosures is November 15, 2018. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (TH)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER staying the case until 10/15/2018; directing parties to file a Joint Status Report by 10/15/2018 or within 5 days of a significant development re status of the state criminal proceedings. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER re: 21 Stipulated Motion to Stay Initial Scheduling Deadlines. The deadlines for initial disclosures and submission of the Joint Status Report are moved to 14 days after the Court rules on the County's pending motion or the Court lifts any stay it decides to order, whichever occurs later. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER directing Plaintiffs to file the corrected complaint 2 as an amended complaint no later than Wednesday, March 21, 2018, at 12:00 p.m. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE directing Plaintiffs to show cause as to why the court should not treat Plaintiffs' 2 corrected complaint as an amended complaint. Show Cause Response due by Monday, March 19, 2018, at 5:00 p.m. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
