Wright v. Pacholke et al
| Orlando Wright |
| Dan Pacholke, Tina Burgess, Denise Hinrichsen, Mac Pevey, Elisabeth Rasler, Wendy Stigall and Washington State Department of Corrections |
| 2:2018cv00399 |
| March 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
STIPULATED JUDGMENT. Plaintiff Orlando Wright shall have judgment against defendant Washington State Department of Corrections. (See Judgment for details) Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER re Parties' 26 Stipulated Motion Dismissing Individual Defendants and Editing Caption: The only defendant identified in any subsequent pleading, including any Judgment, shall be the Washington State Department of Corrections. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER re parties' 22 Stipulated Motion for Briefing Schedule. The parties' motions will be filed by 7/25/2019, with a noting date of 8/16/2019; in lieu of reply briefs, the parties are permitted to file enlarged response briefs of up to 36 pages; the parties' response briefs are due by the noting date of 8/16/2019. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
