Phytelligence, Inc. v. Washington State University
| Phytelligence Inc |
| Washington State University |
| 2:2018cv00405 |
| March 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Richard A Jones |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
ORDER granting parties' 152 Stipulated Motion to Unseal Documents. As stated in the Motion, the Parties respective declarations will be refiled by the parties with the documents referenced unsealed. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER denying Defendant's 127 Motion for Attorneys' Fees on Patent and Trademark Infringement Claims; denying as moot Defendant's 130 Motion to Seal; denying as moot Plaintiff's 140 Motion to Seal. The Court did not materially rely on Dkts. # 132 , # 142 , or # 143 in reaching this ruling. These documents may remain under seal. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 102 Motion for Reconsideration; granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 104 Motion to Seal. Plaintiff's Motion to Seal (Dkt. # 104 ) is GRANTED with regard to Exhibit J found at Dkt. # 106 -5 a nd DENIED as to all other exhibits. Dkt. # 106 is to remain sealed with its attachments and Plaintiff is DIRECTED to refile the Declaration of Sara L. Tolbert and all exhibits except Exhibit J on the docket in unsealed form. Washington State Univ ersity has waived its request for an award of damages on its Counterclaim against Phytelligence. Accordingly, no damages are awarded to Washington State University on its Counterclaim, therefore this case is CLOSED and the Judgment (Dkt. # 97 ) stands. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
116
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND ORDER ON THE COUNTERCLAIM OF WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY re: parties' 110 Stipulated Motion for Permanent Injunction. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER re: parties' 108 Stipulated Motion Extending Deadline for WSU's Response Motion for Reconsideration 102 . WSU's Response due no later than July 15, 2019. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER REOPENING CASE with previous trial date of 7/29/2019. A Second Status Conference will be set for 7/12/2019 at 1:30 PM. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER granting Defendant Washington State University's 46 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing all of Plaintiff Phytelligence's claims; terminating all pending motions as moot 78 80 92 . All currently sealed documents are to remain sealed. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER re: 84 Stipulated Motion Regarding Renoting of and Briefing Schedule for WSU's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Peter Wrobel. WSU shall file a Notice of Motion Renoted that changes the noting date for WSU's 78 Motion to Exclude to June 14, 2019. Phytelligence's opposition due June 3, 2019; WSU's reply due June 14, 2019. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER re: parties' 72 Stipulated Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines. Discovery to be completed by 4/19/2019, Motions related to discovery due by 3/7/2019, Dispositive motions due by 5/2/2019. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER re: 38 Stipulated Motion for Amended Order Setting Trial Date and Related Deadlines. Jury Trial is RESET for 7/29/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. The pretrial deadlines in this matter shall be reset by the Clerk accordingly in a new scheduling order. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
37
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re parties' 36 Stipulation signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (TH)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER directing parties to file a Supplemental Joint Status Report no later than twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 8 Motion to Remand & Request for Attorneys' Fees & Costs; and denying as moot Plaintiff's 9 Motion for Relief from Initial Court Order Setting Deadlines. The Court will issue a new initial scheduling order. Signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (TH)
|
|
Filing
22
MINUTE ORDER reassigning this action to the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez because it is related to Case No. CV18-361RSM. All pleadings filed in the future shall bear case numbers CV18-00405RSM. Authorized by Judge Richard A. Jones. (TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Phytelligence, Inc. v. Washington State University | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Phytelligence Inc | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Andrew Brown |
| Represented By: | Daniel Velloth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Washington State University | |
| Represented By: | Stuart R. Dunwoody |
| Represented By: | Conner G Peretti |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
