Smith et al v. Aircraft Specialties Services, Inc. et al
| Carol Ann Smith and Stephen L. Smith |
| Aircraft Specialties Services, Inc. and John Does 1-20 |
| 2:2018cv00412 |
| March 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Island |
| John C Coughenour |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER granting Defendant's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiffs' 21 Motion to Amend; and denying Defendant's 33 Motion for Sanctions. Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant are DISMISSED. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
37
MINUTE ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 28 Motion for Relief from Deadline for Mediation. The mediation deadline in this case is hereby EXTENDED to 4/30/2019. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
|
Filing
13
MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 12 Stipulated Motion for Withdrawal and Substitution of Attorneys for Defendant. Attorney Yvonne M. Benson and Maggie Diefenbach and the law firm Gordon Thomas Honeywell hereby withdraw as counsel of reco rd for Defendant Aircraft Specialties Services, Inc. Douglas A. Hofmann and the law firm Williams, Kastner & Gibbs, PLLC are hereby SUBSTITUTED as counsel of record for Defendant Aircraft Specialties Services, Inc. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
