Godwin v. Andrews et al
| Shawn Lee Godwin |
| Stuart Andrews, Debbie Bellinger, Alta Langdon and Snohomish County |
| 2:2018cv00431 |
| March 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Snohomish |
| James P. Donohue |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER adopting the 36 Report and Recommendation; dismissing action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (PM) cc: Plaintiff via first class mail
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting plaintiff's 26 Motion for extension of time to respond to defendants' 21 motion for summary judgment; striking plaintiff's 27 Motion requesting discovery; denying plaintiff's 28 Motion for appointment of counsel. Plaintiff's response to defendants' motion for summary judgment is due 11/19/2018; Reply due 11/30/2018. Defendants' 21 Motion for Summary Judgment is RE-NOTED for 11/30/2018. Signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (PM) cc: plaintiff via first class mail
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; dismissing Defendant Snohomish County from this action with prejudice, by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT) (Snohomish County terminated) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (TH) (cc: Plaintiff via first class mail)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
