Sial v. AT&T Services Inc et al
| Muhammad Ejaz Sial |
| AT&T Services Inc, Jie McKnight and John Doe McKnight |
| 2:2018cv00458 |
| March 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Snohomish |
| James L. Robart |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER on Motions to Dismiss and Motion to Remand. The Court grants the motion for voluntary dismissal with prejudice (Dkt. # 20 ), DISMISSES Mr. Sial's Title VII claims with prejudice, DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the rem aining state law claims, GRANTS the motion to remand (Dkt. # 15 ), and DENIES the motion to dismiss as moot (Dkt. # 11 ). All further proceedings in this case are REMANDED to the Superior Court for King County in the State of Washington.Per LCR 3(I), case will be remanded 14 days from the date of this Order, on 7/24/2018. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (TH)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Deadline for Submission of Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan re parties' 19 Stipulated MOTION. It is hereby ORDERED that that the deadline for submission of the Parties' Combined Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan is extended until June 18, 2018. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
