Silbaugh v. The Department of Homeland Security et al
| Alisha R Silbaugh |
| The Department of Homeland Security, John Dean, Unidentified Federal Protective Service Officer #1, Unidentified Federal Protective Service Officer #2 and "Feelie |
| 2:2018cv00569 |
| April 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Kitsap |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff's claims; terminating as moot all pending motions. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff must write a short and plain statement telling the Court why the time limit for service should be extended in this case. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Failure to file will result in dismissal of this case. Plaintiff's Motion to Correct the Identity of the Named Defendant (Dkt. # 13 ) is STRICKEN as procedurally improper. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (TH)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Judge Ricardo S Martinez. (PM)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (PM) cc: plaintiff via first class mail
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
