Gilbert v United States of America
Ruchell Gilbert |
USA |
2:2018cv00798 |
May 31, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
XX US, Outside District |
John C Coughenour |
Motions to Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER granting Petitioner's 1 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). The Court vacates and reenters Petitioner's judgment and sentence for the sole purpose of allowing Petitioner to file a notice of appeal. Petitioner's 14 MOTION to Seal is granted. The Clerk is DIRECTED to maintain Docket Number 15 under seal for the pendency of this case. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM) cc: Petitioner via first class mail |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' 7 Stipulated Motion to Continue Briefing Schedule. Respondent shall file its answer no later than Monday, August 27, 2018. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting Petitioner's 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Court finds it appropriate for current counsel, Jennifer Kaplan, to represent Defendant during the pendency of this habeas proceeding. Furthermore, the Court ORDERS that within forty-five days after the posting of this order, the United States shall file and serve an answer. Signed by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH) (cc: Petitioner via first class mail) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.