Ophrys, LLC v. OneMain Financial, Inc. et al
| Ophrys, LLC |
| OneMain Financial, Inc., OneMain Financial Services, Inc. and CF Network Issuance Trust 2010-1 |
| 2:2018cv00826 |
| June 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Thomas S. Zilly |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
MINUTE ORDER directing parties to file another Joint Status Report (i) within fourteen (14) days after the pending motion to dismiss is decided in Ophrys, LLC v. OneMain Financial, Inc., D. Del. Case No. 1:17- cv-260-RGA or the Delaware matter is resolved, or (ii) by 7/15/2019, whichever occurs earlier. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER directing parties to file another Joint Status Report (i) within fourteen (14) days after the pending motion to dismiss is decided in Ophrys, LLC v. OneMain Financial, Inc., D. Del. Case No. 1:17-cv-260-RGA or the Delaware matter is resolved, or (ii) by 3/1/2019, whichever occurs earlier. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
28
MINUTE ORDER re Defendant CF Network Issuance's Second Amended 27 Corporate Disclosure Statement. The Court is satisfied that complete diversity exists in this matter. This case remains stayed pending further order of the Court. The parties are DIRECTED to file a Joint Status Report (i) within fourteen (14) days after the pending motion to dismiss is decided in Ophrys, LLC v. OneMain Financial, Inc., D. Del. Case No. 1:17-cv-260-RGA or the Delaware matter is resolved, or (ii) by December 31, 2018, whichever occurs earlier. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (TH)
|
|
Filing
26
MINUTE ORDER deferring defendants' 17 MOTION to Dismiss or Transfer; STAYING case pending further order of the Court; directing defendant CF Network Issuance Trust 2010-1 to file a revised corporate disclosure statement within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Minute Order. Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
20
MINUTE ORDER. Within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Minute Order, defendants OneMain Financial Group, LLC, successor by merger to OneMain Financial, Inc., and CF Network Issuance Trust 2010-1 shall file amended corporate disclosure statements setting forth all members, owners, or beneficiaries, and their respective citizenships, as of April 30, 2018, the date the complaint was filed in King County Superior Court, as of June 7, 2018, the date the case was removed, and as of the date just prior to any dissolution. In addition, defendant CF Network Issuance Trust 2010-1 may (but is not required to) provide a brief concerning how its citizenship should be determined and/or why its citizenship should not be considered in assessing whethe r the parties in this matter are diverse. Any such brief shall be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Minute Order, and if such brief is submitted, then plaintiff may, within fourteen (14) days thereafter, file a responsive brief. No reply brief shall be filed unless requested by the Court. The parties' stipulated motion, docket no. 16 , to stay the deadline for defendants to file responsive pleadings is STRICKEN. Defendants have filed a responsive motion, docket no. 17 , which is noted for July 6, 2018, and their deadline for filing responsive pleadings is set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4). Authorized by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (TH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
