SunTrust Banks, Inc v. Be Yachts, LLC et al
| SunTrust Banks, Inc |
| Be Yachts, LLC and Edward Balassanian |
| Be Yachts, LLC and Edward Balassanian |
| SunTrust Banks, Inc |
| 2:2018cv00840 |
| June 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| XX US, Outside District |
| Brian A Tsuchida |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER denying Defendants' 78 Motion Contesting Plaintiff's Supplemental Attorneys' Fees Declarations. The Court DENIES Defendants' Motion, after taking into account the conceded reductions from Plaintiff of $6,445.00. Plaintiff is therefore awarded a total of $226,535.00 in attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(PM)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER 69 MOTION for Attorney Fees, 74 Order on Motion for Attorney Fees, 75 Declaration. The Court shall permit Defendants an opportunity to contest individual billing entries or categories of billing entries as listed in Plaintiff's supplemental declarations. Defendants' motion contesting Plaintiff's billing entries shall be filed no later than November 6, 2020. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER granting in part Plaintiff's 69 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is ORDERED to provide short, unredacted, declarations and exhibits that include billing entries for successful motions or claims by October 9, 2020. Plaintiff's pending Motion for a Bill of Costs (Dkt. No. 70 ) will be re-noted for the same day. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (LH)
|
|
Filing
67
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. The Court finds that SunTrust Banks, Inc. is entitled to judgment in its favor in full. Defendants' counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice. SunTrust Banks, Inc. is awarded $797,979.60 for its claim for breach of contract. SunTrust Banks, Inc. may move for its reasonable fees and costs incurred in this case. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
60
PRETRIAL ORDER signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 32 Motion for Sanctions; denying Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice (Dkt. No. 31 , Ex. 3); denying Defendants' 25 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 30 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Plaintiff's Motions to Strike (Dkt. Nos. 38 , 42 ). Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM) (Main Document 52 replaced on 5/5/2020 - order corrected. NEF regenerated to counsel) (PM).
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying Plaintiff's second 46 Motion for Continuance of FRCP 26(a)(2) (d)(ii) Deadline to Provide Rebuttal Expert Disclosures. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 33 Ex Parte Motion for of FRCP 26(a)(2)(d)(ii) Deadline to Provide Rebuttal Expert Disclosures. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting Parties' 28 Stipulated Motion for Continuance of Noting Date on Defendants' 25 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The 25 Motion noting date will be extended from December 6, 2019 to December 20, 2019. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 16 Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Third Counterclaim; granting Defendants' Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
