Viramontes-Gomez v. Nielson et al
| Jose Martin Viramontes-Gomez |
| Kirsten Nielson, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III, Natalie R Asher and Warden |
| 2:2018cv00935 |
| June 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| Pierce |
| James P. Donohue |
| James L. Robart |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING 19 Report and Recommendation. The Government's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 9 ) is GRANTED. Petitioner's habeas petition is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (TH) (cc: Petitioner via first class mail)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Petitioner's 14 MOTION to Consolidate Cases. The Government's 9 motion to dismiss shall with withdrawn as moot. The Court will rule on the motion to dismiss that was filed in C18-941RAJ-BA T(Dkt. #8). The Clerk shall consolidate C18-941RAJ-BAT with C18-935JLR-JPD. The parties shall have 14 days to object to this Order. All future filings shall be filed in C18-935JLR-JPD. Signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (PM) cc: petitioner via first class mail
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 7 Notice of Related Case. Parties are directed to show cause whether cases should be consolidated. Show Cause Response due within 14 days of this order. Signed by Hon. James P. Donohue. (PM) cc: Petitioner via first class mail
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
