Ashmun v. Commissioner of Social Security
Wendy Ashmun |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
2:2018cv01186 |
August 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
David W Christel |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney David J Burdett on behalf of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Burdett, David) |
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on on 8/29/2018, filed by Plaintiff Wendy Ashmun. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Martinez, Janet) |
Filing 5 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Commissioner of Social Security (CMG) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against defendant Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Wendy Ashmun. (Receipt #SEA091996) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(CMG) |
Filing fee received: $ 400, receipt number SEA091996 (CDA) |
Filing 3 ORDER denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis signed by Judge David W. Christel. To proceed with the case, Plaintiff must pay the $400.00 filing fee by September 14, 2018. (KEB) |
Filing 2 CONSENT by Plaintiff to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. (KEB) |
Judge David W. Christel added. (DJ) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis , filed by Wendy Ashmun. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons)(Martinez, Janet) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.