National Products Inc v. Opteka, Inc
| National Products Inc |
| Opteka, Inc. and Opteka, Inc |
| 2:2018cv01248 |
| August 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Marsha J Pechman |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 REPLY, filed by Defendant Opteka, Inc, TO RESPONSE to #16 MOTION for Protective Order to Stay Discovery and Strike Initial Case Events (Atkins, Michael) |
| Filing 22 DECLARATION of Jessica M. Kaempf In Support of National Products Inc.'s Response In Opposition filed by Plaintiff National Products Inc re #16 MOTION for Protective Order to Stay Discovery and Strike Initial Case Events (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Feb. 2018 email thread between M. Alvarez and W. Mattia (3 pp), #2 Exhibit 2 - Mar. 2018 email thread between Opteka's counsel and M. Alvarez (3 pp), #3 Exhibit 3 - Oct. 5, 2018 email thread btwn Opteka's and NPI's counsel [excerpted] (7 pp), #4 Exhibit 4 - Sep. 6, 2018 Amazon Policy Warning Email (4 pp), #5 Exhibit 5 - Oct. 2, 2018 email and attachment Opteka's counsel (5 pp), #6 Exhibit 6 - 2018 10 10 NPI's 1st RFPs to Opteka (Nos. 1-59) (14 pp), #7 Exhibit 7 - 2018 10 10 NPI's 1st ROGs to Opteka (Nos. 1-13) (11 pp))(Kaempf, Jessica) |
| Filing 21 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff National Products Inc, to #16 MOTION for Protective Order to Stay Discovery and Strike Initial Case Events. (Kaempf, Jessica) |
| Filing 20 DECLARATION of Gerry Grunsfeld filed by Defendant Opteka, Inc re #18 MOTION to Transfer Case (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7)(Atkins, Michael) |
| Filing 19 DECLARATION of Ronny Shmoel filed by Defendant Opteka, Inc re #18 MOTION to Transfer Case (Atkins, Michael) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Transfer Case , filed by Defendant Opteka, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 11/9/2018, (Atkins, Michael) |
| Filing 17 DECLARATION of Gerry Grunsfeld filed by Defendant Opteka, Inc re #16 MOTION for Protective Order to Stay Discovery and Strike Initial Case Events (Atkins, Michael) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Protective Order to Stay Discovery and Strike Initial Case Events, filed by Defendant Opteka, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 10/19/2018, (Atkins, Michael) |
Filing 15
ORDER re: parties' #14 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendant Opteka, Inc. to file and serve its responsive pleading to NPI's amended complaint is extended to 10/25/2018. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (PM)
|
| Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , filed by Defendant Opteka, Inc. Noting Date 10/4/2018, (Atkins, Michael) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 11/2/2018, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 10/19/2018, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 10/26/2018, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (RM)
|
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Opteka, Inc with JURY DEMAND, filed by National Products Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Kaempf, Jessica) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER re #10 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Gerry Grunsfeld for Opteka, Inc, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
|
| Filing 10 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Gerry Grunsfeld FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant Opteka, Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-5475066 (Atkins, Michael) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Michael G Atkins on behalf of Defendant Opteka, Inc. (Atkins, Michael) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Opteka, Inc. on 8/30/2018, filed by Plaintiff National Products Inc. (Kaempf, Jessica) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action in Trademark Trial & Appeal Board, case number in other court 92068360 ; filed by Plaintiff National Products Inc. (Kaempf, Jessica) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by National Products Inc (Kaempf, Jessica) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Jessica M. Kaempf on behalf of Plaintiff National Products Inc. (Kaempf, Jessica) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER: Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See Attached Letter for More Information and Instructions. (DJ) |
| Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a Trademark. Emailed to the U.S. Patent Office. (DJ) |
| Filing 2 Summons(es) electronically issued as to defendant(s) Opteka, Inc. (DJ) |
| Judge Marsha J. Pechman added. (DJ) |
| NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff(s) National Products Inc must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 8/31/2018. (DJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Declaratory Judgment against defendant(s) Opteka, Inc. with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # 0981-5445938) Attorney David K Tellekson added to party National Products Inc(pty:pla), filed by National Products Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - TM Registration 4418619, #2 Exhibit B - TM Registration 4323554, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Report on Patents and Trademarks (AO Form 120))(Tellekson, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
