United States of America v. Dargey et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Lobsang Dargey
Garnishee: Sprint
Case Number: 2:2018cv01347
Filed: September 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
Presiding Judge: Robert S Lasnik
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 00 U.S.C. ยง 0000
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER denying defendant/judgment debtor's #17 Motion to Have the Government Pay Taxes on Seized/Garnished Property. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Defendant via USPS)
November 5, 2018 Filing 18 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff United States of America, to #17 MOTION to Have the Government Pay Taxes on Sezied/Garnished Property. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Forsyth, Kyle)
October 3, 2018 Filing 17 MOTION to Have the Government Pay Taxes on Sezied/Garnished Property, filed by Defendant Lobsang Dargey. Noted by Clerk for 10/19/2018. (Clerk updated Plaintiff's address to FCI Sheridan (Satellite Camp) P.O. Box 6000, Sheridan, OR 97378) (PM)
October 1, 2018 Filing 16 Mail addressed to Lobsang Dargey returned as Undeliverable re #12 Order, #13 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. (Re-mailed to current address.) (SWT)
September 24, 2018 Filing 15 Mail addressed to Lobsang Dargey returned as Undeliverable re Case Assigned/Reassigned. Mailed to updated address. (SWT)
September 24, 2018 Filing 14 Mail addressed to Lobsang Dargey returned as Undeliverable (unable to forward) re #11 Order. (Per bop.gov, Lobsang Dargey is now at Sheridan FCI. Address updated and #11 Order mailed to current address.) (SWT)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Continuing Garnishment re plaintiff's #7 Motion, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
September 12, 2018 Case Reassigned to Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Judge Thomas S. Zilly no longer assigned to the case. All future filings shall bear the cause number C18-1347 RSL. (SWT) Modified to indicate cc defendant via USPS on 9/12/2018 (SWT).
September 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER directing Clerk to give this matter a civil action number and assign it in rotation. The Writ of Garnishment remains in effect during pendency of this action. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT) Modified docket text to indicate cc to defendant on 9/12/2018 (SWT).
September 11, 2018 Filing 10 REPLY, filed by Plaintiff United States of America, TO RESPONSE to #7 MOTION to Issue Continuing Garnishee Order (Garnishee Sprint c/o Fidelity Workplace Svcs, LLC) (Forsyth, Kyle)
September 6, 2018 Filing 9 RESPONSE TO UNITED STATES MOTION TO ISSUE CONTINUING GARNISHEE ORDER by Defendant Lobsang Dargey, to #7 MOTION to Issue Continuing Garnishee Order (Garnishee Sprint c/o Fidelity Workplace Svcs, LLC) . (SG)
August 17, 2018 Filing 8 DECLARATION of Dawn Fernandez filed by Plaintiff United States of America re #7 MOTION to Issue Continuing Garnishee Order (Garnishee Sprint c/o Fidelity Workplace Svcs, LLC) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Forsyth, Kyle)
August 17, 2018 Filing 7 MOTION to Issue Continuing Garnishee Order (Garnishee Sprint c/o Fidelity Workplace Svcs, LLC) , filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 9/7/2018, (Forsyth, Kyle)
October 27, 2017 Filing 6 ANSWER to Writ of Garnishment by Sprint. (ST)
October 10, 2017 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Plaintiff United States of America (Forsyth, Kyle)
October 6, 2017 Filing 4 NOTICE to Defendant/Judgment Debtor from Clerk, United States District Court.(ST)
October 6, 2017 Filing 3 WRIT of Continuing Garnishment Electronically Issued (ST)
October 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER to Issue Writ of Continuing Garnishment and Notice to Defendant/Judgment Debtor by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (ST)
October 4, 2017 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Continuing Garnishment, filed by United States of America against defendant Lobsang Dargey in the amount of $ 23,747,390.00 (Fee waived) (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Dawn Fernandez, #2 PROPOSED Writ of Continuing Garnishment, #3 PROPOSED Order to Issue Writ of Continuing Garnishment, #4 Notice to Defendant/Judgment Debtor from Clerk, United States District Court, #5 Email from Filer)(ST)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Dargey et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Garnishee: Sprint
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lobsang Dargey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Kyle A. Forsyth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?