Sanchez v. Youngquist et al
| Sergio Sanchez and Sergio G Sanchez |
| Jane Doe, SCJC Entity Municipality, John Doe, Chief of Corrections Don Marlow and Jeanne Youngquist |
| 2:2018cv01355 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Barbara J Rothstein |
| Mary Alice Theiler |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER DECLINING TO SERVE COMPLAINT AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. Plaintiffs motion for a TRO and/or preliminary injunction (Dkt. 4-10) is STRICKEN. (cc: Plaintiff Order and Complaint form served via USPS)(SG)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiff Sergio G Sanchez. (SG) |
| Filing 8 1983 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND, filed by Sergio G Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(SG) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND DIRECTING INSTITUTION TO CALCULATE, COLLECT, AND FORWARD PAYMENTS (cc: Plaintiff, WAWD Finance) by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler. (SG)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/10/2018, (SG) |
| Filing 6 LETTER from Sergio Sanchez re prison trust account statement. (Clerk mailed docket sheet to plaintiff with docket entries #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and #5 Prison Trust Account highlighted to confirm prison trust account statement has been received by the court) (ST) |
| Filing 5 Prison Trust Account Statement (SG) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Theiler., filed by Sergio G Sanchez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Prison Trust Account, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Envelopes, #10 PROPOSED Motion for TRO or Preliminary Injunction)(ST) |
| Filing 3 LETTER from Sergio Sanchez re #2 IFP Deficiency Letter.(ST) |
| **DISREGARD** NOTICE TO FILER: Plaintiff stated in #3 Letter that he mailed the prison trust account statement in a separate envelope, however, it was never received by the Court. The plaintiff is directed to resubmit the prison trust account by 10/15/2018 as indicated in the #2 IFP Deficiency Letter. (cc: plaintiff w/copy of docket report via USPS) (ST) Modified on 9/21/2018. Trust account received on 9/10/18 as attachment 2 to #1 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is the form that Skagit County Jail provides to inmates. Letter removed from mail and was not sent to plaintiff. (ST) |
| IFP deficiency corrected re #2 IFP Deficiency Letter (ST) |
| Filing 2 LETTER mailed re IFP deficiency; - Please provide a certified copy of your prison trust account statement showing transactions for the last six months. Filer has until 10/15/2018 to correct (SG) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Sergio Sanchez (Attachments: #1 Proposed 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Prison Trust Account Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7)(SG) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/13/2018: #9 Envelopes Exhibit 8, #10 Proposed Motion) (SG). Modified on 9/21/2018 to change descriptions of Attachments 2 and 9. (ST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
