Lundli v. Nielsen et al
| Sara Lynn Lundli |
| Homeland Security |
| L. Francis Cissna, Cynthia Munita, Donald Neufeld and Kirstjen Nielsen |
| 2:2018cv01389 |
| September 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 12/20/2018, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 12/6/2018, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 12/13/2018, by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (LW)
|
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) L. Francis Cissna, Cynthia Munita, Donald Neufeld, Kirstjen Nielsen (ST) |
| Judge Ricardo S. Martinez and Hon. James P. Donohue added. (ST) Modified on 9/25/2018. A referral judge should not have been assigned. (ST) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition for Writ of Mandamus against defendant(s) Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen, L. Francis Cissna, Donald Neufeld, and Cynthia Munita (Receipt # 0981-5479544) Attorney Nicholas Wright Marchi added to party Sara Lynn Lundli(pty:pla), filed by Sara Lynn Lundli. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Marchi, Nicholas) Modified on 9/26/2018 to reflect title of document filed (KB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
