Marino v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc et al
Joseph Thomas Marino |
DOES 1-10, inclusive, Convergent Outsourcing, Inc and Does 1-10 |
2:2018cv01392 |
September 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Richard A Jones |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER REGARDING FRCP 26(f) CONFERENCE, INITIAL DISCLOSURES, AND JOINT STATUS REPORT. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 11/26/2018, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 12/3/2018, Joint Status Report due by 12/10/2018, by Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Donald Gene Grant on behalf of Defendant Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. (Grant, Donald) |
Filing 4 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Convergent Outsourcing, Inc on 10/3/2018 (Stasch, Sarah) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE) |
Filing 2 Summons(es) electronically issued as to defendant(s) Convergent Outsourcing, Inc. (DJ) |
Judge Richard A. Jones added. (DJ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Does 1-10, Convergent Outsourcing, Inc with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # 0981-5480364) Attorney Sarah A Stasch added to party Joseph Thomas Marino(pty:pla), filed by Joseph Thomas Marino. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Stasch, Sarah). Modified on 9/24/2018 (DJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.