Barker v. Thrive Causemetics, Inc. et al
Plaintiff:
Sara M. Barker
Defendant:
Thrive Causemetics, Inc. and Karissa Bodnar
Case Number:
2:2018cv01470
Filed:
October 5, 2018
Court:
Washington Western District Court
Presiding Judge:
Thomas S Zilly
Nature of Suit:
P.I.: Other
Cause of Action:
28:1332
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Follow this docket report by RSS
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| November 9, 2018 | 16 | REPLY, filed by Defendant Karissa Bodnar, TO RESPONSE to #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Devlin, John) |
| November 5, 2018 | 15 | DECLARATION of Elizabeth A. Hanley filed by Plaintiff Sara M. Barker re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Hanley, Elizabeth) |
| November 5, 2018 | 14 | RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Sara M. Barker, to #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hanley, Elizabeth) |
| October 19, 2018 | 13 | VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendants Karissa Bodnar, Thrive Causemetics, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-I)(Devlin, John) |
| October 18, 2018 | 12 | DECLARATION of Taylor Washburn filed by Defendant Karissa Bodnar re #11 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Devlin, John) |
| October 18, 2018 | 11 | MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant Karissa Bodnar. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 11/9/2018, (Devlin, John) |
| October 18, 2018 | 10 | ANSWER to Complaint; by Thrive Causemetics, Inc..(Devlin, John) |
| October 18, 2018 | 9 |
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 12/17/2018, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 12/3/2018, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 12/17/2018, by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (KD)
|
| October 18, 2018 | 8 | DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Sara M. Barker (Marshall, Toby) |
| October 10, 2018 | 7 | LETTER from Clerk to counsel re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (SG) |
| October 10, 2018 | Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. (SG) | |
| October 5, 2018 | 6 | CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Karissa Bodnar, Thrive Causemetics, Inc. (Devlin, John) |
| October 5, 2018 | 5 | NOTICE to Plaintiff of Removal re #1 Notice of Removal ; filed by Defendants Karissa Bodnar, Thrive Causemetics, Inc.. (Devlin, John) |
| October 5, 2018 | 4 | DECLARATION of Erin Wilson in Support of Removal re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendants Karissa Bodnar, Thrive Causemetics, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Devlin, John) |
| October 5, 2018 | 3 | DECLARATION of Karissa Bodnar in Support of Removal re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendants Karissa Bodnar, Thrive Causemetics, Inc. (Devlin, John) |
| October 5, 2018 | 2 | DECLARATION of Ned Menninger in Support of Removal re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendants Karissa Bodnar, Thrive Causemetics, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exibits A and B)(Devlin, John) |
| October 5, 2018 | 1 | NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 18-2-21685-1; (Receipt # 0981-5499018), filed by Karissa Bodnar, Thrive Causemetics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint)(Devlin, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
