Withey et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Plaintiff: Michael E. Withey and Sharon Maeda
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Case Number: 2:2018cv01635
Filed: November 9, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2018 Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).(Fairchild, Katie)
December 19, 2018 Filing 14 ERRATA re #1 Complaint, with Corrected Complaint (Attached) by Plaintiffs Sharon Maeda, Michael E. Withey (Attachments: #1 Complaint)(Diamondstone, Fred)
December 14, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Katie Denise Fairchild on behalf of Defendant Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). (Fairchild, Katie)
December 14, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Kayla Stahman on behalf of Defendant Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). (Stahman, Kayla)
November 21, 2018 Filing 11 Second Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (TH)
November 20, 2018 Filing 10 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS to FBI by Plaintiffs Sharon Maeda, Michael E. Withey (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Diamondstone, Fred)
November 14, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Related Case(s) 82-1055, by Plaintiffs Sharon Maeda, Michael E. Withey. (Diamondstone, Fred)
November 14, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Complaint. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See Attached Letter for More Information and Instructions. (KB)
November 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (PP)
November 14, 2018 Filing 6 MINUTE ENTRY re: STATUS CONFERENCE. The attorney who will be responsible for trying the case, or that attorney's representative, should attend the conference and be prepared to discuss the following matters at the conference: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation; If counsel's office is outside of the Greater Metropolitan Seattle area, local counsel should attend on behalf of non-local counsel. If local counsel is unavailable, non-local counsel may make arrangements to participate telephonically in the conference by contacting the Courtroom Deputy Clerk at Paul_Pierson@wawd.uscourts.gov at least TEN (10) DAYS in advance of the proceeding. Counsel do NOT need to file a Joint Status Report or Rule 26(f) Report in advance of the Status Conference. Counsel should plan on arriving 10-15 minutes early to check in with the Courtroom Deputy Clerk as the Court's calendar begins promptly at 9:00 a.m. COUNSEL OR THE PRO SE PARTY WHO FILED THIS MATTER SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ALL PARTIES OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE SCHEDULED STATUS CONFERENCE. A Status Conference is ordered set for 2/26/2019 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 16206 before U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (PP)
November 14, 2018 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing of Summons and Complaint to FBI - Director OIP on 11/13/2018, filed by Plaintiffs Sharon Maeda, Michael E. Withey. (Diamondstone, Fred)
November 13, 2018 Filing 4 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) (GT)
November 13, 2018 U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour added. (GT)
November 12, 2018 Filing 3 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS to FBI by Plaintiffs Sharon Maeda, Michael E. Withey (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Diamondstone, Fred)
November 9, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET ; filed by Plaintiffs Sharon Maeda, Michael E. Withey. (Diamondstone, Fred)
November 9, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) All Plaintiffs (Receipt # 0981-5538313) Attorney Fred Diamondstone added to party Sharon Maeda(pty:pla), Attorney Fred Diamondstone added to party Michael E. Withey(pty:pla), filed by Michael E. Withey, Sharon Maeda. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1-16 (with redactions))(Diamondstone, Fred)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Withey et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael E. Withey
Represented By: Fred Diamondstone
Represented By: Michael E Withey
Represented By: Leah S. Snyder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon Maeda
Represented By: Fred Diamondstone
Represented By: Michael E Withey
Represented By: Leah S. Snyder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Represented By: Katie Denise Fairchild
Represented By: Kayla Stahman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?