Discher v. Malloy et al
James Discher |
Michael A. Malloy, The F/V Thor, Michael Malloy and F/V Yukon |
2:2018cv01735 |
December 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Ricardo S Martinez |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE of summons upon defendant Michael Malloy mailed on 12/10/2018 (Oberg, Markus) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Markus B G Oberg on behalf of Defendant Michael Malloy. (Oberg, Markus) |
Filing 3 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 2/14/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 1/31/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 2/7/2019, by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (LW) |
Filing 2 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Michael Malloy (GT) |
Judge Ricardo S. Martinez added. (GT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Seaman's Complaint In Rem and In Personam for Wages, Penalties and Punitive Damages-All Without Payment of Costs, 28 U.S.C. sec 1916 against defendant(s) Michael A. Malloy, The F/V Thor Yukon, filed by James Discher. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Praecipe for a Summons, #3 Summons Michael Malloy, #4 Praecipe Not to Arrest the Vessel)(Merriam, John) (Fee Waived) Modified on 12/4/2018 to correct second defendant name (GT). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.