Flynn v. Pierce County et al
| John Fredrick Flynn, III |
| Patricia Pethick, Pierce County, Lori Kennedy and Charles Bonet |
| 2:2018cv01813 |
| December 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 REPLY, filed by Defendant Pierce County, TO RESPONSE to #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Wasankari, Brian) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff John Fredrick Flynn, III, to #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . Oral Argument Requested. (Kahrs, Michael) |
Filing 9
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C.Coughenour. (PP)
|
| Filing 8 MINUTE ENTRY re: STATUS CONFERENCE. The attorney who will be responsible for trying the case, or that attorney's representative, should attend the conference and be prepared to discuss the following matters at the conference: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation; If counsel's office is outside of the Greater Metropolitan Seattle area, local counsel should attend on behalf of non-local counsel. If local counsel is unavailable, non-local counsel may make arrangements to participate telephonically in the conference by contacting the Courtroom Deputy Clerk at Paul_Pierson@wawd.uscourts.gov at least TEN (10) DAYS in advance of the proceeding. Counsel do NOT need to file a Joint Status Report or Rule 26(f) Report in advance of the Status Conference. Counsel should plan on arriving 10-15 minutes early to check in with the Courtroom Deputy Clerk as the Court's calendar begins promptly at 9:00 a.m. COUNSEL OR THE PRO SE PARTY WHO FILED THIS MATTER SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ALL PARTIES OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE SCHEDULED STATUS CONFERENCE. A Status Conference is set for 4/16/2019 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 16206 before U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (PP) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE that the following is RE-NOTED: #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . Filed by Defendant Pierce County. Noting Date 2/1/2019, (Wasankari, Brian) |
| Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant Pierce County. (Attachments: #1 Appendices A-K, #2 Proposed Order) Noting Date 1/18/2019, (Wasankari, Brian) |
| Filing 5 LETTER from Clerk to counsel re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (GT) |
| U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour added. (GT) |
| Filing 4 PRAECIPE to attach document (Superior Court Pleading) re #3 Verification of State Court Records by Defendant Pierce County (Attachments: #1 Notice to Adverse Party of Removal to Federal Court)(Wasankari, Brian) |
| Filing 3 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS by Defendant Pierce County (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Wasankari, Brian) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Defendant Pierce County (Wasankari, Brian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 18-2-26464-2 SEA; (Receipt # 0981-5584089), filed by Pierce County. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Complaint)(Wasankari, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
