Lillywhite v. AECOM et al
Plaintiff: Eric Lillywhite
Defendant: AECOM's Severance Plan, URS Corporation, AECOM and Does 1-40
Case Number: 2:2018cv01840
Filed: December 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2019 Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' #17 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's complaint by 4/11/2019. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (PM)
February 12, 2019 Filing 17 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , filed by Defendant AECOM's Severance Plan. Noting Date 2/12/2019, (Phillips, Shannon)
February 8, 2019 Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint; by AECOM, URS Corporation.(Phillips, Shannon)
February 1, 2019 Filing 15 NOTICE of Change of Address/Change of Name of Attorney Tonie L Bitseff. Filed by Plaintiff Eric Lillywhite. (Bitseff, Tonie)
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (PP)
January 16, 2019 Filing 13 MINUTE ENTRY re: STATUS CONFERENCE. The attorney who will be responsible for trying the case, or that attorney's representative, should attend the conference and be prepared to discuss the following matters at the conference: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation; If counsel's office is outside of the Greater Metropolitan Seattle area, local counsel should attend on behalf of non-local counsel. If local counsel is unavailable, non-local counsel may make arrangements to participate telephonically in the conference by contacting the Courtroom Deputy Clerk at Paul_Pierson@wawd.uscourts.gov at least TEN (10) DAYS in advance of the proceeding. Counsel do NOT need to file a Joint Status Report or Rule 26(f) Report in advance of the Status Conference. Counsel should plan on arriving 10-15 minutes early to check in with the Courtroom Deputy Clerk as the Court's calendar begins promptly at 9:00 a.m. COUNSEL OR THE PRO SE PARTY WHO FILED THIS MATTER SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ALL PARTIES OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE SCHEDULED STATUS CONFERENCE. A Status Conference is set for 4/16/2019 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 16206 before U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (PP)
January 14, 2019 Filing 12 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint by Counsel Shannon Phillips and Quinn Oppenheim, on behalf of AECOM's Severance Plan, on 1/10/2019. (Phillips, Shannon)
January 9, 2019 Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER granting #10 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. The deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's complaint is extended to 2/8/2019. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (LW)
January 8, 2019 Filing 10 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , filed by Defendants AECOM, AECOM's Severance Plan, URS Corporation. Noting Date 1/8/2019, (Phillips, Shannon)
January 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER re #8 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Deke W Bond for Defendants AECOM, AECOM's Severance Plan, and for URS Corporation, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
January 3, 2019 Filing 8 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Deke Bond FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendants AECOM, AECOM's Severance Plan, URS Corporation (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-5600577 (Phillips, Shannon)
December 28, 2018 Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent AECOM Technical Services, Inc for URS Corporation. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by AECOM, AECOM's Severance Plan, Does 1-40, URS Corporation (Phillips, Shannon)
December 27, 2018 Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER granting parties' #4 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint. The deadline for Defendants AECOM and URS Corporation to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint is hereby EXTENDED to 1/11/2019. Authorized by U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour. (TH)
December 21, 2018 Filing 5 LETTER from Clerk to counsel re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (SNP)
December 21, 2018 Filing 4 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint, filed by Defendant AECOM. Noting Date 12/21/2018, (Phillips, Shannon)
December 21, 2018 U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour added. (SNP)
December 21, 2018 NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Defendants(s) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 12/28/2018. (SNP)
December 20, 2018 Filing 3 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS by Defendant AECOM (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-9)(Phillips, Shannon)
December 20, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE to Plaintiff of Removal re #1 Notice of Removal, ; filed by Defendant AECOM. (Phillips, Shannon)
December 20, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 18-2-25900-2; (receipt #0981-5598006), filed by AECOM. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Jury Demand, #4 Declaration in Support of Removal)(Phillips, Shannon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lillywhite v. AECOM et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AECOM's Severance Plan
Represented By: Mary Quinn Oppenheim
Represented By: Shannon E Phillips
Represented By: Deke W Bond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: URS Corporation
Represented By: Mary Quinn Oppenheim
Represented By: Shannon E Phillips
Represented By: Deke W Bond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AECOM
Represented By: Mary Quinn Oppenheim
Represented By: Shannon E Phillips
Represented By: Deke W Bond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-40
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Lillywhite
Represented By: Tonie Louise Bitseff
Represented By: Tonie L Bitseff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?