Kim et al v. Western-Blossom Hill Investors et al
Danny Kim and Big Construction Corporation |
Western-Los Gatos 1 Investors, Essex Management Corporation, Essex Redmond Hill NE, L.P., Western-Blossom Hill Investors and Essex Redmond Hill NE LP |
2:2018cv01879 |
December 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Ricardo S Martinez |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Stipulated MOTION to Extend Deadlines for Initial Disclosures and Joint Status Report and Early Settlement, filed by Defendants Essex Redmond Hill NE LP, Western-Blossom Hill Investors, Western-Los Gatos 1 Investors. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 2/25/2019, (Krashan, Allison) |
Filing 11 COUNTER-DEFENDANTS ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO COUNTERCLAIMS ANSWER to #6 Answer to Complaint,, Counterclaim, by Big Construction Corporation, Danny Kim.(Nguyen, Theresa) |
Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Essex Management Corporation, Essex Redmond Hill NE LP, Western-Blossom Hill Investors, Western-Los Gatos 1 Investors (Krashan, Allison) |
Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Western-Blossom Hill Investors, Western-Los Gatos 1 Investors (Krashan, Allison) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Western-Blossom Hill Investors, Western-Los Gatos 1 Investors (Krashan, Allison) |
Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Western-Blossom Hill Investors, Western-Los Gatos 1 Investors (Krashan, Allison) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint; Affirmative Defenses, COUNTERCLAIM against plaintiff Big Construction Corporation by Western-Los Gatos 1 Investors, Essex Redmond Hill NE LP, Western-Blossom Hill Investors, Essex Management Corporation.(Dumm, Ryan) |
Filing 5 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 2/14/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 1/31/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 2/7/2019, by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (LW) |
Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk to counsel re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (SNP) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Notice of Removal,. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See Attached Letter for More Information and Instructions. (SNP) |
Judge Ricardo S. Martinez added. (SNP) |
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff(s) and Defendant(s) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 1/9/2019. (SNP) |
Filing 2 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS by Defendants Essex Management Corporation, Essex Redmond Hill NE, L.P., Western-Blossom Hill Investors, Western-Los Gatos 1 Investors (Krashan, Allison) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 18-2-25484-6 KNT 18-2-54584-6 KNT; (Receipt # 0981-5596785), filed by Western-Los Gatos 1 Investors, Essex Redmond Hill NE, L.P., Western-Blossom Hill Investors, Essex Management Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Krashan, Allison) Modified on 1/2/2019 to correct state court case number (KB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.