Emrit v. Soros et al
| Ronald Satish Emrit |
| Securities and Exchange Commission, Federal Communications Commission, George Soros and Federal Trade Commission |
| 2:2019cv00024 |
| January 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail addressed to Ronald Satish Emrit returned as Undeliverable re #2 IFP Deficiency Letter,, (TH) |
| Filing 2 LETTER mailed re IFP deficiency; - The proper IFP form was not submitted. Enclosed please find the correct IFP form to be filled out in full and returned to the Court. - In addition, you have noted Jury Demand on the Civil Cover Sheet but not on the Complaint. Pursuant to LCR 38(b), the words JURY DEMAND shall be typed in capital letters on the first page immediately below the name of the pleading to the right of the name of the cause. Please file a separate Jury Demand in order to advise the court of this request.Filer has until 2/7/2019 to correct. cc plaintiff via US Mail (SNP) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(SNP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
