Ski Lifts Inc v. Schaeffer Manufacturing Co
| Ski Lifts Inc |
| Schaeffer Manufacturing Co. and Schaeffer Manufacturing Co |
| 2:2019cv00062 |
| January 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| John C Coughenour |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint; with JURY DEMAND by Schaeffer Manufacturing Co.(Martens, Richard) |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Schaeffer Manufacturing Co (Martens, Richard) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Boyne USA, Inc. for Ski Lifts Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Ski Lifts Inc (Butler, Amanda) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ENTRY re: STATUS CONFERENCE. The attorney who will be responsible for trying the case, or that attorney's representative, should attend the conference and be prepared to discuss the following matters at the conference: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation; If counsel's office is outside of the Greater Metropolitan Seattle area, local counsel should attend on behalf of non-local counsel. If local counsel is unavailable, non-local counsel may make arrangements to participate telephonically in the conference by contacting the Courtroom Deputy Clerk at Paul_Pierson@wawd.uscourts.gov at least TEN (10) DAYS in advance of the proceeding. Counsel do NOT need to file a Joint Status Report or Rule 26(f) Report in advance of the Status Conference. Counsel should plan on arriving 10-15 minutes early to check in with the Courtroom Deputy Clerk as the Court's calendar begins promptly at 9:00 a.m. COUNSEL OR THE PRO SE PARTY WHO FILED THIS MATTER SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ALL PARTIES OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE SCHEDULED STATUS CONFERENCE. A Status Conference is set for 3/19/2019 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 16206 before U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (PP) |
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (PP)
|
| Filing 5 PRAECIPE to attach document (Corrected signature page (page 5) to Petition for Removal) re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant Schaeffer Manufacturing Co (Martens, Richard) |
| Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk to counsel re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (SNP) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Notice of Removal,. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See Attached Letter for More Information and Instructions. (SNP) |
| U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour added. (SNP) |
| NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff(s) and Defendant(s) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 1/22/2019. (SNP) |
| Filing 2 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal (Declaration of James Carroll) by Defendant Schaeffer Manufacturing Co. (Martens, Richard) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 18-2-57498-6; (Receipt # 0981-5613086), filed by Schaeffer Manufacturing Co.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martens, Richard) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/15/2019: #2 Complaint) (SNP). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
