Flavel et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company et al
Derrick Flavel and Lisa Flavel |
Nautilus Insurance Company and Scottsdale Insurance Company |
2:2019cv00082 |
January 17, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Thomas S Zilly |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 REPLY, filed by Plaintiffs Derrick Flavel, Lisa Flavel, TO RESPONSE to #15 MOTION to Remand (Burke, Thomas) |
Filing 21 RESPONSE, by Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company, to #15 MOTION to Remand . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shickich, Daniel) |
Filing 20 DECLARATION of Peter J. Mintzer filed by Defendant Nautilus Insurance Company re #15 MOTION to Remand (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Mintzer, Peter) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE, by Defendant Nautilus Insurance Company, to #15 MOTION to Remand . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mintzer, Peter) |
Filing 18 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent W.R. Berkley Corporation for Nautilus Insurance Company. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Nautilus Insurance Company (Mintzer, Peter) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Per telephonic request, the deadline for a Rule 26(f) conference is EXTENDED 60 days to 5/17/2019, and the deadlines for initial disclosures and submission of a Joint Status Report are EXTENDED to 5/31/2019. (KD) |
Filing 17 REPLY, filed by Defendant Nautilus Insurance Company, TO RESPONSE to #8 MOTION for Joinder in Scottsdale Ins. Co.'s #7 MOTION to Dismiss , #7 MOTION to Dismiss (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mintzer, Peter) |
Filing 16 REPLY, filed by Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company, TO RESPONSE to #7 MOTION to Dismiss (Shickich, Daniel) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Remand , filed by Plaintiffs Derrick Flavel, Lisa Flavel. Oral Argument Requested. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Thomas Burke, #2 Declaration of Derrick Flavel, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order) Noting Date 3/8/2019, (Burke, Thomas) |
Filing 14 RESPONSE, by Plaintiffs Derrick Flavel, Lisa Flavel, to #7 MOTION to Dismiss . (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Thomas Burke, #2 Declaration of Derrick Flavel)(Burke, Thomas) |
Filing 13 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS (King County Cause No. 18-2-57278-9) by Defendant Nautilus Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Mintzer, Peter) |
Filing 12 ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 4/1/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 3/18/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 4/1/2019, by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (KD) |
Filing 11 REDACTION to #6 Praecipe to Attach Document, State Court Complaint by Defendant Nautilus Insurance Company (Hynes, David) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Daniel Francis Shickich on behalf of Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Shickich, Daniel) |
Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER (Unsigned) re #7 MOTION to Dismiss (Shickich, Daniel) |
NOTE re Document #7 . Appearance of attorney Daniel Shickich is not proper, and notices of electronic filing will not be sent until corrected. Signatures must be in accordance with FRCP 11 and LCR 83.2(a) and must comply with #ECF Filing Procedures. This can be corrected by filing a notice of appearance. (SWT) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Joinder in Scottsdale Ins. Co.'s #7 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendant Nautilus Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 2/15/2019, (Mintzer, Peter) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Defendant Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) Noting Date 2/15/2019, (Shickich, Daniel) |
NOTICE TO FILER: re #6 Praecipe to Attach Document. Document (state court Complaint) contains personal identifiers (minor's name and date of birth) that must be redacted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and Local Civil Rule 5.2. You are required to re-file a redacted version of your document using the event "Redacted Document" located in the Other Documents category. This event will allow you to link back to your original filing and will not affect your original filing date. Pursuant to FRCP 5.2 and LCR 5.2, the document(s) have been administratively sealed by the Court. (SWT) |
Filing 6 PRAECIPE to attach document re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant Nautilus Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 SEALED Complaint)(Mintzer, Peter) Modified on 1/24/2019 to seal Complaint because it contains minor's name (SWT). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney David Joseph Hynes on behalf of Defendant Nautilus Insurance Company. (Hynes, David) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company for Scottsdale Insurance Company. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company (Bridgman, Geoff) |
Filing 3 LETTER from Clerk to counsel re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (SNP) |
Filing 2 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Notice of Removal,. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See Attached Letter for More Information and Instructions. (SNP) |
Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. (SNP) |
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Defendant(s) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 1/25/2019. (SNP) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 18-2-57278-9-KNT; (Receipt # 0981-5618124) Attorney Peter J Mintzer added to party Nautilus Insurance Company(pty:dft), filed by Nautilus Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mintzer, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.