TeleCommunication Systems Inc v. Houserman et al
Plaintiff: Telecommunication Systems Inc. and TeleCommunication Systems Inc
Defendant: Lynne Houserman, MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC. and Motorola Solutions Inc
Case Number: 2:2019cv00336
Filed: March 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Richard A Jones
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2019 Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Other Affiliate BlackRock, Inc. for Motorola Solutions Inc. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Motorola Solutions Inc (Calfo, Angelo)
May 1, 2019 Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Defendants' Answer to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Lynne Houserman, Motorola Solutions Inc.(Calfo, Angelo)
April 2, 2019 Reset Deadlines -- By agreement of the parties, and for good cause shown, the following deadlines are reset: FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 5/14/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 5/21/2019, Joint Status Report due by 5/28/2019. (VE)
April 1, 2019 Reset Deadline: Pursuant to the parties' #15 Stipulated MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint, the deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to 5/1/2019. The parties' stipulation and this extension shall not operate as an admission of any factual allegation or legal conclusion, nor shall it operate as a waiver nor affect any right, defense, claim or objection, including lack of personal jurisdiction. (VE)
March 28, 2019 Filing 15 Stipulated MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint and [Proposed] Order, filed by Defendants Lynne Houserman, Motorola Solutions Inc. Noting Date 3/28/2019, (Reilly-Bates, Gabriel)
March 28, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Gabriel Reilly-Bates on behalf of Defendants Lynne Houserman, Motorola Solutions Inc. (Reilly-Bates, Gabriel)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER re #10 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Patrick J Lamparello for TeleCommunication Systems Inc, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER re #9 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney David Bayer for TeleCommunication Systems Inc, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER re #8 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney John P Barry for TeleCommunication Systems Inc, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
March 28, 2019 Filing 10 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Patrick J. Lamparello FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff TeleCommunication Systems Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-5705664 (Gilman, Eric)
March 28, 2019 Filing 9 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY David Bayer FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff TeleCommunication Systems Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-5705653 (Gilman, Eric)
March 28, 2019 Filing 8 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY John P. Barry FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff TeleCommunication Systems Inc (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-5705646 (Gilman, Eric)
March 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REGARDING FRCP 26(f) CONFERENCE, INITIAL DISCLOSURES, AND JOINT STATUS REPORT. FRCP 26(f) Conference Deadline is 4/11/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 4/18/2019, Joint Status Report due by 4/25/2019, by Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE)
March 27, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Angelo J Calfo on behalf of Defendants Lynne Houserman, Motorola Solutions Inc. (Calfo, Angelo)
March 21, 2019 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Motorola Solutions Inc. on 3/11/2019, filed by Plaintiff TeleCommunication Systems Inc. (Gilman, Eric)
March 21, 2019 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Lynne Houserman on 3/11/2019, filed by Plaintiff TeleCommunication Systems Inc. (Gilman, Eric)
March 7, 2019 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER for Civil Cases Assigned to Judge Richard A. Jones. (VE)
March 7, 2019 Filing 2 Summonses Electronically Issued as to defendants Lynne Houserman and Motorola Solutions Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(GT)
March 7, 2019 Judge Richard A. Jones added. (GT)
March 6, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # 0981-5678501) Attorney Shelly M. Andrew added to party Telecommunication Systems Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Telecommunication Systems Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Houserman, #3 Summons Motorola Solutions Inc., #4 Plaintiff's Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Andrew, Shelly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TeleCommunication Systems Inc v. Houserman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Telecommunication Systems Inc.
Represented By: Eric Daniel Gilman
Represented By: Shelly M. Andrew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TeleCommunication Systems Inc
Represented By: Eric Daniel Gilman
Represented By: Shelly M. Andrew
Represented By: John P Barry
Represented By: David Bayer
Represented By: Patrick J Lamparello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lynne Houserman
Represented By: Gabriel Reilly-Bates
Represented By: Angelo J Calfo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Motorola Solutions Inc
Represented By: Gabriel Reilly-Bates
Represented By: Angelo J Calfo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?