Tunison et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Jon Tunison and Roxanne Tunison |
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois |
2:2019cv00503 |
April 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Safeco Corporation, Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Corporate Parent LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc., Corporate Parent Safeco Insurance Company of America, Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Agency Corporation, Corporate Parent Liberty Insurance Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Group Inc. for Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois (Pierce-Wright, Christopher) |
Filing 2 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal Declaration of Chris Pierce-Wright by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Pierce-Wright, Christopher) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 19-2-06930-9; (Receipt # 0981-5717676), filed by Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint)(Pierce-Wright, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.