Ocean Peace Inc v. Neitz-Ramos
Ocean Peace, Inc |
Christopher Neitz-Ramos |
2:2019cv00624 |
April 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against defendant(s) Christopher Neitz-Ramos (Receipt # 0981-5745903) Attorney Daniel J Park added to party Ocean Peace, Inc(pty:pla), filed by Ocean Peace, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Park, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ocean Peace Inc v. Neitz-Ramos | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Christopher Neitz-Ramos | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ocean Peace, Inc | |
Represented By: | Daniel J Park |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.