Barr v. Pigott
| Heather Winslow Barr |
| Joseph Stanley Pigott and King Abdul Mumin El |
| 2:2019cv00682 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DECLARATION by Respondent Joseph Stanley Pigott (Pigott, Joseph) Modified on 7/1/2019 to correct title of document (PM). |
| Filing 24 MINUTE ORDER terminating #23 MOTION for Joinder filed by Joseph Stanley Pigott. The following MINUTE ORDER is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief United States District Judge: On June 10, 2019, Respondent filed a document captioned as "Robin L. Crawford Joinder to This Case." Dkt. #23. To the extent this filing is intended as a motion for required or permissive joinder, the Court STRIKES the filing as not properly signed by Respondent, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and this Court's Local Civil Rules. To the extent this filing is intended as a motion to intervene, the Court STRIKES the filing as procedurally improper. Ms. Crawford, the movant, did not file the motion. The motion is not "accompanied by a pleading that sets out the claim or defense for which intervention is sought," as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(c). Lastly, the filing makes no effort to satisfy the requirements for intervention or explain why an apparent Texas state court eviction action between Ms. Crawford, an apparently unrelated party, and an apparently unrelated business entity has any factual or legal relationship to this case. (CAO) |
| Filing 23 MOTION for Joinder , filed by Respondent Joseph Stanley Pigott. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 6/28/2019, (Pigott, Joseph) |
| ***Motion terminated: #22 MOTION for Joinder filed by Joseph Stanley Pigott. Motion refiled with proposed order as Dkt. #23 which remains pending. (PM) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Joinder , filed by Respondent Joseph Stanley Pigott. Noting Date 6/28/2019, (Pigott, Joseph) |
| Filing 21 Mail addressed to Heather Winslow Barr returned as Undeliverable re #15 Order to Show Cause, (TH) |
| Filing 20 MINUTE ORDER renoting #17 MOTION to Remand. The following MINUTE ORDER is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief United States District Judge: Respondent removed this action to this Court on May 7, 2019. Dkt. #1. The Court subsequently required Respondent to show cause, by June 12, 2019, why this Court had jurisdiction, why removal was proper, and why the action should not be remanded. Dkt. #15. On June 5, 2019, Petitioner filed a Motion to Remand, treating it as a response to the Court's Order to Show Cause and noting it for June 12, 2019. Dkt. #17. The Court did not require that Petitioner respond to the Court's Show Cause Order and the Court's local rules otherwise require that a motion for remand be noted no sooner than the fourth Friday following filing. LCR 7(d)(3). Accordingly, the Court renotes Petitioner's Motion to Remand (Dkt. #17) for June 28, 2019, in accordance with LCR 7(d). (CAO) |
| Filing 19 AMENDED NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Mathew J. Cunanan on behalf of Petitioner Heather Winslow Barr. (Cunanan, Mathew) Modified on 6/6/2019 - Clerk's note: Attorney David Tracy is not on this amended notice of appearance. Mr. Tracy will not be added as counsel in this case. (PM). |
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification re #16 Amended Notice of Appearance: edited text to reflect this is an amended appearance. Attorney David Tracy is not on the amended notice of appearance and will not be added as counsel in this case. (PM) |
| NOTICE REGARDING LACK OF PROPER SIGNATURE. The #16 Notice of Appearance was improperly signed by David Tracy. As such, Mr. Tracy was not added to the case and will not receive future notices until corrected. Signatures must be in accordance with FRCP 11 and LCR 83.2(a) and must comply with #ECF Filing Procedures. Please file corrected signature page using Praecipe to Attach event and link to original filing. (PM) |
| Filing 18 DECLARATION of David Tracy filed by Petitioner Heather Winslow Barr re #17 MOTION to Remand (Cunanan, Mathew) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Remand and Response to Show Cause Order #15 , filed by Petitioner Heather Winslow Barr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Declaration of David Tracy) Noting Date 6/12/2019, (Cunanan, Mathew) Modified on 6/6/2019 to add link and language re: Show Cause Order (PM). |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Mathew J. Cunanan on behalf of Petitioner Heather Winslow Barr. (Cunanan, Mathew) |
Filing 15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Court ORDERS that Respondent, no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, shall SHOW CAUSE (1) why the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter, (2) why removal was properly accomplished in accordance with the applicable federal statutes, and (3) why this action should not be remanded for a lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (SWT) (cc: Petitioner via USPS)
|
| Filing 14 Mail addressed to Heather Winslow Barr returned as Undeliverable re #6 Joint Status Report Order Form for District Judges (TH) |
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT PLAINTIFF'S ADDRESS by Respondent Joseph Stanley Pigott (Pigott, Joseph) |
| NOTICE TO FILER: re #11 Supplement (main document only). Document contains personal identifiers (Dates of birth, page 30) that are required to be redacted per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and Local Civil Rule 5.2, and has been administratively sealed. Please file a redacted version of the document as soon as practicable. This will not affect your original filing date. (PM) |
| Filing 13 Mail addressed to Heather Winslow Barr returned as Undeliverable re #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (MW) |
| Filing 11 SEALED SUPPLEMENT NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Respondent Joseph Stanley Pigott (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Pigott, Joseph) Modified on 5/24/2019 to seal main document only due to sensitive personal identifiers. (PM). |
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Respondent Joseph Stanley Pigott (Pigott, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Respondent Joseph Stanley Pigott (Pigott, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE: Respondent Joseph Stanley Pigott has registered to electronically file and receive electronic service in this case. (PS) |
| Filing 7 Mail addressed to Heather Winslow Barr returned as Undeliverable re #3 Judge Assignment Letter (Removal & Transfer cases only) (TH) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 6/26/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 6/12/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 6/19/2019, by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. cc:parties via USPS (LW)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson.(MW)(cc: Petitioner and Respondent via USPS
|
| Filing 3 LETTER from Clerk to counsel re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (cc: petitioner and respondent via USPS) (ST) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed by Joseph S Pigott.(ST) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, filed by Joseph S Pigott. Case number 17-3-05075-3 SEA. (IFP Pending) (Attachments: #1 Complaint (Petition for Divorce), #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ST) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
