Stewart v. Johnston et al
Plaintiff: Glen Thomas Stewart
Defendant: Charles Johnston and Does 1-10
Case Number: 2:2019cv00715
Filed: May 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Michelle L Peterson
Referring Judge: James L Robart
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 10, 2019 Filing 8 JUDGMENT BY COURT in favor of Does 1-10, Charles Johnston against Glen Thomas Stewart. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Plaintiff's civil rights complaint and this action are dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. (cc: plaintiff via USPS) (SG)
July 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #5 Report and Recommendations, by Judge James L. Robart. The Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted. Plaintiff's civil rights complaint (Dkt #4 -1) and this action are DISMISSED, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (e)(2)(B)(ii). Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt #4 ) is DENIED as moot. (cc: Plaintiff via USPS) (SG)
June 21, 2019 Filing 6 OBJECTIONS by Plaintiff Glen Thomas Stewart to #5 Report and Recommendations,. Noting Date 7/12/2019, (SG)
June 6, 2019 Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Glen Thomas Stewart. Objections to R&R due by 6/27/2019, Noting Date 6/27/2019, by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Judgment)(cc: Plaintiff via USPS)(SG)
May 23, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis before Judge Peterson, filed by Glen Thomas Stewart. (Attachments: #1 PROPOSED 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Prison Trust Account, #3 Letter from Filer re IFP)(ST)
May 23, 2019 IFP deficiency corrected (ST)
May 14, 2019 Filing 3 LETTER mailed re IFP deficiency; - The proper IFP form was not submitted. Enclosed please find the correct IFP form to be filled out in full and returned to the Court. Filer has until 6/13/2019 to correct. (cc: plaintiff via USPS w/IFP form) (ST)
May 13, 2019 Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Glen Thomas Stewart (Attachments: #1 Proposed 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, #2 Prison Trust Account)(ST)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stewart v. Johnston et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glen Thomas Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Johnston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?