CASE NUMBER NOT USED
The Mold Pros Franchising, Inc. and The Mold Pros Franchising Inc |
Mycosolutions, Inc., Marc Core, William Treinen and MycoSolutions Inc |
2:2019cv00780 |
May 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Contract: Franchise |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE TO FILER: ***Case Terminated-Incorrect Division*** Civil case number 19-cv-780 has been terminated. The incorrect divisional office was selected by the filer upon case opening. This case has now been assigned a Tacoma case number and Judge. All future filings shall bear the following case number: 19-cv-5454-BHS. Before initiating a new case, please review the #Attorney Case Opening Guide (PDF) to determine the correct divisional jurisdiction. (ST) |
***Civil Case Terminated. Incorrect divisional office selected by filer. Please see C19-cv-5454-BHS for all filings in this matter. (ST) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by The Mold Pros Franchising, Inc. (Cox, Sarah) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Receipt # 0981-5778390) Attorney Sarah Cox added to party The Mold Pros Franchising, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by The Mold Pros Franchising, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(Cox, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.