Macias v. Pfizer Inc
| Judith Macias |
| Pfizer Inc |
| 2:2019cv00923 |
| June 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Barbara J Rothstein |
| P.I. : Asbestos |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, and Affirmative Defenses by Pfizer Inc.(Alkhazov, Marissa) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (RM)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 8/19/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 8/5/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 8/12/2019, by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (RM)
|
| Attorney Emily Ann Albrecht for Pfizer Inc added; per #6 Notice of Appearance. (TH) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Marissa Alkhazov on behalf of Defendant Pfizer Inc. (Alkhazov, Marissa) |
| NOTE re: Document #4 . Appearance of attorney Emily A. Albrecht and John Krawczyk is not proper, and notices of electronic filing will not be sent until corrected. Signatures must be in accordance with FRCP 11 and LCR 83.2(a) and must comply with #ECF Filing Procedures. (TH) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Pfizer Inc (Alkhazov, Marissa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Marissa Alkhazov on behalf of Defendant Pfizer Inc. (Alkhazov, Marissa) |
| Filing 3 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Pfizer Inc. (GT) |
| Judge Barbara J. Rothstein added. (GT) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET re #1 Complaint, ; filed by Plaintiff Judith Macias. (Weinstein, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Judith Macias Pfizer Inc with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # 0981-5806304) Attorney Brian Weinstein added to party Judith Macias(pty:pla), filed by Judith Macias. (Attachments: #1 Summons Cover Sheet Plaintiff's Submission of Summons to Clerk for Issuance, #2 Summons)(Weinstein, Brian) Modified on 6/13/2019 correct docket text (CDA). Modified on 6/14/2019 to correct attachment title(GT). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Macias v. Pfizer Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pfizer Inc | |
| Represented By: | Emily Ann Albrecht |
| Represented By: | Marissa Alkhazov |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Judith Macias | |
| Represented By: | Brian Weinstein |
| Represented By: | Alexandra B Caggiano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
