Beeman v. City of Sedro Woolley
| City of Sedro Woolley and Armen Beeman |
| 2:2019cv00924 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES; Length of Trial: *3-4 days*. Jury Trial is set for 7/27/2020 at 9:00 AM before Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. Joinder of Parties due by 9/10/2019, Amended Pleadings due by 9/10/2019, Expert Witness Disclosure/Reports under FRCP 26(a)(2) due by 1/29/2020, Motions due by 2/28/2020, Discovery completed by 3/30/2020, Dispositive motions due by 4/28/2020, 39.1 mediation to be completed by 6/12/2020, Motions in Limine due by 6/29/2020, Pretrial Order due by 7/15/2020, Trial briefs to be submitted by 7/22/2020, Proposed voir dire/jury instructions due by 7/22/2020. Signed by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (LW)
|
|
Filing 8
JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties estimated Trial Days: 3-4. Filed by Defendant City of Sedro Woolley.(Parker, Zachary)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 8/2/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 7/19/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 7/26/2019, by Judge Ricardo S. Martinez. (LW)
|
|
Filing 6
DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Armen Beeman (Moody, Rodney)
|
|
Filing 5
VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant City of Sedro Woolley (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit State Court Record)(Miller, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Zachary B Parker on behalf of Defendant City of Sedro Woolley. (Parker, Zachary)
|
|
Filing 3
LETTER from Clerk to re receipt of case from Skagit County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (GT)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Notice of Removal. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See Attached Letter for More Information and Instructions. (GT)
|
|
Judge Ricardo S. Martinez added. (GT)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Skagit County Superior Court, case number 19-2-00683-29; (Receipt # 0981-5807795), filed by City of Sedro Woolley. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Miller, Thomas)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Beeman v. City of Sedro Woolley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: City of Sedro Woolley | |
| Represented By: | Zachary B Parker |
| Represented By: | Thomas P Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Armen Beeman | |
| Represented By: | Rodney R Moody |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
