Leonard v. The Boeing Company
| Daniel Leonard |
| The Boeing Company |
| 2:2019cv00956 |
| June 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Thomas S Zilly |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 JOINT STATUS REPORT signed by all parties estimated Trial Days: 5. (Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
| Filing 17 REPLY, filed by Defendant The Boeing Company, TO RESPONSE to #13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE, by Plaintiff Daniel Leonard, to #13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Moody, Rodney) |
Filing 15
ORDER re #11 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Christopher Banks for Defendant The Boeing Company, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
|
| Filing 14 DECLARATION of Melody Luschei filed by Defendant The Boeing Company re #13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - ECAPR, #2 Exhibit 2 - PRO 4332)(Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
| Filing 13 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant The Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 7/19/2019, (Sharbaugh, Matthew) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 8/26/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 8/12/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 8/26/2019, by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. (KD)
|
| Filing 11 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Christopher J. Banks FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant The Boeing Company (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-5824823 (Shapero, Laurence) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER re #9 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Matthew J. Sharbaugh for defendant The Boeing Company, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(DS)
|
| Filing 9 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Matthew J. Sharbaugh FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant The Boeing Company (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-5818289 (Shapero, Laurence) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Other Affiliate State Street Bank & Trust Company, Other Affiliate Evercore Trust Company, N.A., Other Affiliate State Street Corporation, Other Affiliate The Boeing Company Voluntary Investment Plan, Other Affiliate Evercore Partners, Other Affiliate The Boeing Company Employee Savings Plans Master Trust for The Boeing Company. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by The Boeing Company (Shapero, Laurence) |
| Filing 7 DEMAND for JURY TRIAL by Plaintiff Daniel Leonard (Moody, Rodney) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Notice of Removal. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See Attached Letter for More Information and Instructions. Please disregard previously issued Notice to Filer. (GT) |
| Filing 5 DISREGARD - FILED IN ERROR - NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Notice of Removal. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See Attached Letter for More Information and Instructions. (GT) Modified on 6/21/2019 (GT). |
| Filing 4 LETTER from Clerk to re receipt of case from Snohomish County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (GT) |
| Judge Thomas S. Zilly added. (GT) |
| Filing 3 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant The Boeing Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Docket)(Shapero, Laurence) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Melody Luschei re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant The Boeing Company (Shapero, Laurence) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Snohomish County Superior Court, case number 19-2-04710-31; (Receipt # 0981-5815237), filed by The Boeing Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint - Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Shapero, Laurence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Leonard v. The Boeing Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Boeing Company | |
| Represented By: | Laurence A Shapero |
| Represented By: | Matthew J. Sharbaugh |
| Represented By: | Christopher Banks |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Leonard | |
| Represented By: | Rodney R Moody |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
