New South Insurance Company v. Vargas et al
New South Insurance Company |
Amanda S. Vargas, Margaret Inouye, Marco S. Torres, Maria Vargas, Marco S Torres and Amanda S Vargas |
2:2019cv00994 |
June 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Robert S Lasnik |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Margaret Inouye on 8/13/2019, filed by Plaintiff New South Insurance Company. (Lether, Thomas) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Amanda Vargas on 8/7/2019, filed by Plaintiff New South Insurance Company. (Lether, Thomas) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Maria Vargas on 8/7/2019, filed by Plaintiff New South Insurance Company. (Lether, Thomas) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Marco S. Torres on 8/7/2019, filed by Plaintiff New South Insurance Company. (Lether, Thomas) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney G William Shaw on behalf of Defendant Margaret Inouye. (Shaw, G) |
Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent National General Management Corporation for New South Insurance Company. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by New South Insurance Company (Lether, Thomas) |
Filing 4 REDACTION to #1 Complaint, Exhibit A by Plaintiff New South Insurance Company (Lether, Thomas) |
Filing 3 REDACTION to #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff New South Insurance Company (Attachments: SEALED #1 Exhibit A)(Lether, Thomas) Modified on 6/27/2019 to seal personal identifiers (MET). |
Filing 2 Summonses Electronically Issued as to defendants Amanda S Vargas, Marco S Torres, Maria Vargas and Margaret Inouye. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(GT) |
NOTICE TO FILER: re [3 -1] Exhibit A. Document(s) contain personal identifiers that must be redacted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and Local Civil Rule 5.2. You are required to re-file a redacted version of your document using the event "Redacted Document" located in the Other Documents category. This event will allow you to link back to your original filing and will not affect your original filing date. Pursuant to FRCP 5.2 and LCR 5.2, the document(s) have been administratively sealed by the Court. (MET) |
Judge Robert S. Lasnik added. (GT) |
NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Complaint,. Document(s) contain personal identifiers that must be redacted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and Local Civil Rule 5.2. You are required to re-file a redacted version of your document using the event "Redacted Document" located in the Other Documents category. This event will allow you to link back to your original filing and will not affect your original filing date. Pursuant to FRCP 5.2 and LCR 5.2, the document(s) have been administratively sealed by the Court. (GT) |
NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, New South Insurance Company must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 7/5/2019. (GT) |
Filing 1 SEALED COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against All Defendants (Receipt # 0981-5823113), filed by New South Insurance Company. (Attachments: # SEALED (1) Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Amanda S. Vargas, #4 Summons Marco S. Torres, #5 Summons Maria Vargas, #6 Summons Margaret Inouye)(Lether, Thomas) Sealed in accordance with LCR 5.2. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.