Bookxchange FL LLC v. Book Runners LLC et al
Case Number: 2:2019cv01099
Filed: July 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 1 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff's alternative request to transfer this matter to the Northern District of Illinois for decision is DENIED as moot. Pursuant to LCR 5(g)(3), plaintiff's unopposed motion to file under seal Exhibits A through E to its reply (Dkt. # 10 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TH)
July 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. This matter comes before the Court on Bookxchange FL, LLCs motion to compel compliance with a subpoena related to litigation pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois or, in the alternative, to transfer the motion to that district. The target of the subpoena,, Inc., has opposed the requested relief. In light of the contested nature of this proceeding, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a civil action number. (CDA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bookxchange FL LLC v. Book Runners LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?