Zhang et al v. United States of American et al
Huifang Zhang and Shunichi Takahashi |
US Department of Homeland Security, United States of American, US Customs and Border Protection and Kevin K McAleenan |
2:2019cv01211 |
August 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Ricardo S Martinez |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE: Plaintiff Shunichi Takahashi has registered to electronically file and receive electronic service in this case. (PS) |
Filing 2 LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment. (GT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendants United States of American, US Department of Homeland Security, US Customs and Border Protection, and Kevin K McAleenan.(Receipt # SEA097187), filed by Huifang Zhang, Sunichi Takahashi. (Attachments: #1 SEALED Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Email from filer, #4 Email from filer, #5 Email from filer)(GT) |
NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Complaint,. Document(s) contain personal identifiers that are required to be redacted per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and Local Civil Rule 5.2, and has been administratively sealed. Please file a redacted version of the document as soon as practicable. This will not affect your original filing date. (GT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.