Singh v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
| Gurdeep Dhillon Singh |
| US Department of Justice, US Department of Homeland Security, Stephen Langford, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Elizabeth Godfrey, William Barr, Kevin K McAleenan, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, United States Department of Homeland Security, GEO Group, United States Department of Justice and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 2:2019cv01444 |
| September 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| James L Robart |
| Mary Alice Theiler |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1326 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Proposed Order to Extend, filed by Petitioner Gurdeep Dhillon Singh. Noting Date 11/1/2019, (Lesmez, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 DECLARATION of Lambert filed by Respondents William Barr, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Elizabeth Godfrey, Kevin K McAleenan, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Justice re #5 MOTION to Dismiss and Return (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Lambert, Michelle) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss and Return, filed by Respondents William Barr, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Elizabeth Godfrey, Kevin K McAleenan, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Justice. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 11/1/2019, (Lambert, Michelle) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Michelle R. Lambert on behalf of Respondents William Barr, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Elizabeth Godfrey, Kevin K McAleenan, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Justice. (Lambert, Michelle) |
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL AND DIRECTING SERVICE #1 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order signed by Judge James L. Robart. Petitioner's removal is temporarily STAYED until further order of the Court. Within 30 days of the date of this Order is posted, respondent(s) shall file a return and status report including a response to petitioner's request for stay. Respondent(s) shall note it for the fourth Friday after it is filed. Petitioner may file a response not later than the Monday immediately proceeding the Friday appointed for consideration. Respondent(s) may file a reply brief not later than the Friday designated for consideration (copy of order emailed to ICE and petitioner's counsel contacted re: stay of deportation)(SG)
|
| Filing 2 2241 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Stay of Removal (Receipt # 0981-5920744), filed by Gurdeep Dhillon Singh. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Verification, #2 Exhibit IJ Order with Decision and Determination)(Lesmez, Jennifer) |
| Judge Thomas S. Zilly and Hon. Mary Alice Theiler added. (ST) Modified on 9/11/2019. Reassigned to Judge Robart. (ST) |
| Reassigned to Judge James L. Robart. (ST) |
| Filing 1 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Stay of Removal, filed by Petitioner Gurdeep Dhillon Singh. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 9/10/2019, (Lesmez, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
