Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Oatridge Security Group Inc
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
Oatridge Security Group, Inc. and Oatridge Security Group Inc |
Sarah Olsen |
2:2019cv01517 |
September 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Robert S Lasnik |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 DECLARATION of Elizabeth A. Hanley in Support of Motion by EEOC Claimant Sarah Olsen to Intervene filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Sarah Olsen re #4 MOTION to Intervene (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hanley, Elizabeth) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Intervene , filed by Intervenor Plaintiff Sarah Olsen. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) Noting Date 11/29/2019, (Hanley, Elizabeth) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on Oatridge Security Group, Inc. / Cy Oatridge, Registered Agent on 11/8/2019, filed by Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Healy, Teri) |
Filing 2 Summons Electronically Issued as to defendant Oatridge Security Group Inc. (GT) |
Judge Robert S. Lasnik added. (GT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Oatridge Security Group, Inc. with JURY DEMAND, filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Steele, Roberta) (No Fee Required) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.