Dunlap et al v. King County et al
Plaintiff: Alexis Dunlap and Frank Gittens
Defendant: Todd Miller, King County, Michael Garske, Joseph Eshom and Reed Jones
Case Number: 2:2019cv01535
Filed: September 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: John C Coughenour
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2019 Filing 17 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with JURY DEMAND by Joseph Eshom, Michael Garske, Reed Jones, King County, Todd Miller.(Kolde, Endel)
November 12, 2019 Filing 16 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Joseph Eshom on 10/30/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Owens, David)
November 12, 2019 Filing 15 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Todd Miller on 10/30/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Owens, David)
November 12, 2019 Filing 14 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Michael Garske on 10/30/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Owens, David)
November 12, 2019 Filing 13 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Reed Jones on 10/30/2019 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Owens, David)
November 11, 2019 Filing 12 SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant King County on 11/1/2019 (Owens, David)
October 17, 2019 Filing 11 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) King County (Main Document), Michael Garske, Todd Miller, Joseph Eshom, Reed Jones (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Michael Garske, #2 Summons Issued as to Todd Miller, #3 Summons Issued as to Joseph Eshom, #4 Summons Issued as to Reed Jones) (TH)
October 16, 2019 Filing 10 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS re #1 Complaint, to Todd Miller by Plaintiff Alexis Dunlap (Owens, David)
October 16, 2019 Filing 9 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS re #1 Complaint, to Reed Jones by Plaintiff Alexis Dunlap (Owens, David)
October 16, 2019 Filing 8 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS re #1 Complaint, to Michael Garske by Plaintiff Alexis Dunlap (Owens, David)
October 16, 2019 Filing 7 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS re #1 Complaint, to King County by Plaintiff Alexis Dunlap (Owens, David)
October 16, 2019 Filing 6 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS re #1 Complaint, to Joseph Eshom by Plaintiff Alexis Dunlap (Owens, David)
October 8, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Amy Elizabeth Montgomery on behalf of Defendants Joseph Eshom, Michael Garske, Reed Jones, King County, Todd Miller. (Montgomery, Amy)
October 8, 2019 NOTE re: Document #4 . Appearance of attorney Amy E. Montgomery is not proper, and notices of electronic filing will not be sent until corrected. Signatures must be in accordance with FRCP 11 and LCR 83.2(a) and must comply with #ECF Filing Procedures. (TH)
October 7, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Endel Rohe Kolde on behalf of Defendants Joseph Eshom, Michael Garske, Reed Jones, King County, Todd Miller. (Kolde, Endel)
September 30, 2019 Filing 3 MINUTE ENTRY re: STATUS CONFERENCE. The attorney who will be responsible for trying the case, or that attorney's representative, should attend the conference and be prepared to discuss the following matters at the conference: 1. An estimate of the number of days needed for trial; 2. The date by which the case will be ready for trial; 3. Whether the parties intend to mediate per LCR 39.1 and, if so, when the parties expect to complete mediation; If counsel's office is outside of the Greater Metropolitan Seattle area, local counsel should attend on behalf of non-local counsel. If local counsel is unavailable, non-local counsel may make arrangements to participate telephonically in the conference by contacting the Courtroom Deputy Clerk at Paul_Pierson@wawd.uscourts.gov at least TEN (10) DAYS in advance of the proceeding. Counsel do NOT need to file a Joint Status Report or Rule 26(f) Report in advance of the Status Conference. Counsel should plan on arriving 10-15 minutes early to check in with the Courtroom Deputy Clerk as the Court's calendar begins promptly at 9:00 a.m. COUNSEL OR THE PRO SE PARTY WHO FILED THIS MATTER SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY ALL PARTIES OF THE DATE AND TIME OF THE SCHEDULED STATUS CONFERENCE. A STATUS CONFERENCE is set for 2/4/2020 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 16206 before U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (PP)
September 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY AND DEPOSITIONS by U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour. (PP)
September 26, 2019 U.S. District Judge John C Coughenour added. (SNP)
September 25, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Joseph Eshom, Michael Garske, Reed Jones, King County, Todd Miller with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # 0981-5941019) Attorney David B Owens added to party Alexis Dunlap(pty:pla), filed by Alexis Dunlap, Frank Gittens. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Owens, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dunlap et al v. King County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Todd Miller
Represented By: Amy Elizabeth Montgomery
Represented By: Endel Rohe Kolde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: King County
Represented By: Amy Elizabeth Montgomery
Represented By: Endel Rohe Kolde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Garske
Represented By: Amy Elizabeth Montgomery
Represented By: Endel Rohe Kolde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Eshom
Represented By: Amy Elizabeth Montgomery
Represented By: Endel Rohe Kolde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reed Jones
Represented By: Amy Elizabeth Montgomery
Represented By: Endel Rohe Kolde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexis Dunlap
Represented By: David B Owens
Represented By: Tiffany Mae Cartwright
Represented By: Patricia Bosmans
Represented By: Timothy K. Ford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank Gittens
Represented By: James Bible
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?