Chapman v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
| Jeralee Chapman |
| The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| 2:2019cv01570 |
| October 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Marsha J Pechman |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER re #8 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Ian H Morrison for The Prudential Insurance Company of America, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER re #7 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Shelley Renee Hebert for The Prudential Insurance Company of America, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting Defendant's #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended to and including December 6, 2019. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (TH)
|
| Filing 8 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Ian H. Morrison FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-6016102 (Jansen, Per) |
| Filing 7 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Shelley R. Hebert FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-6016097 (Jansen, Per) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, , filed by Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Noting Date 11/15/2019, (Reilly, D) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 12/11/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 11/27/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 12/4/2019, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (RM)
|
| Attorney D Michael Reilly added for The Prudential Insurance Company of America per #3 Notice of Appearance. (PM) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Prudential Financial, Inc. for The Prudential Insurance Company of America. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by The Prudential Insurance Company of America (Jansen, Per) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney Per D Jansen on behalf of Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Jansen, Per) |
| Filing 2 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) The Prudential Insurance Company of America (SNP) |
| Judge Marsha J. Pechman added. (SNP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Disability Benefits, Equitable Relief, and Declaratory Judgment against defendant(s) The Prudential Insurance Company of America (Receipt # 0981-5947897), filed by Jeralee Chapman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Engle, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
