Ursal v. Amazon Inc
| Sheela Ursal |
| Amazon Inc |
| 2:2019cv01701 |
| October 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Barbara J Rothstein |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER: At the request of the parties, an extension of time to file the joint status report is granted. The report will be due on 1/30/2020. All other FRCP 26-related deadlines are adjusted accordingly. Failure to adhere to these deadlines may result in sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this action. Authorized by Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein. (RM)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Image/Document #9 Standing Order for Civil Cases (Service of image is attached). (RM) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER FOR ALL CIVIL CASES. The procedures in this Order supplement, and in some cases, supersede the local rules. The parties are responsible for being familiar with the procedures in this Order. Failure to comply with the procedures may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (RM) (RM).
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REGARDING INITIAL DISCLOSURES AND JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due by 12/30/2019, FRCP 26f Conference Deadline is 12/16/2019, Initial Disclosure Deadline is 12/23/2019, by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (RM)
|
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT re #4 Verification of State Court Records by Defendant Amazon Inc (Redekopp, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Notice of Removal. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See attached letter for more information and instructions. (GT) |
| Filing 5 LETTER from Clerk re receipt of case from King County Superior Court and advising of WAWD case number and judge assignment. (GT) |
| Judge Barbara J. Rothstein added. (GT) |
| Filing 4 VERIFICATION OF STATE COURT RECORDS re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Amazon Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Redekopp, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT indicating no Corporate Parents and/or Affiliates. Filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1. Filed by Amazon Inc (Redekopp, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Ryan D. Redekopp re #1 Notice of Removal by Defendant Amazon Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Redekopp, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from King County Superior Court, case number 19-2-27424-7 SEA; (Receipt # 0981-5975628), filed by Amazon Inc. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Redekopp, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ursal v. Amazon Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sheela Ursal | |
| Represented By: | Rodney R Moody |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amazon Inc | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Drew Redekopp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
