Ma v. City of Seattle et al
| Handsomeland LLC and Roland Ma |
| Seattle Police Department and City of Seattle |
| 2:2019cv01764 |
| October 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Robert S Lasnik |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 Second MOTION to Lift Stay , filed by Plaintiff Roland Ma. (Attachments: #1 Motion & Order to Dismissal) Noting Date 1/3/2020, (Ma, Roland) |
Filing 27
ORDER denying Plaintiff's #25 Motion for Reconsideration: As discussed in the prior order, this matter remains STAYED until an attorney appears to represent plaintiff or plaintiff provides evidence that the "no contact" provision of his release order is no longer in effect. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)
|
| Filing 26 PRAECIPE TO ISSUE SUMMONS re #1 Complaint, summons were not attached to the complaint by Plaintiff Roland Ma (Attachments: #1 Summons for City of Seattle, #2 Summons for Seattle Police Department)(Ma, Roland) |
| Filing 25 MOTION for Reconsideration re #24 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, Case Stayed should be lifted, filed by Plaintiff Roland Ma. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) Noting Date 12/6/2019, (Ma, Roland) |
|
Filing 24
ORDER denying Plaintiff's #19 Motion to Appoint Counsel and Staying Case. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)
|
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Change of Address/Change of Name Filed by Plaintiff Roland Ma. (Ma, Roland) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER denying Plaintiff's #21 Ex-Parte Motion for Sealing or Restricting Case/Documents signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TH)
|
| Filing 21 Emergency MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings of an ex-parte motion for sealing or restricting case or documents, filed by Plaintiff Roland Ma. Noting Date 11/12/2019, (Ma, Roland) Modified docket text on 11/12/2019 (MW). |
| Filing 20 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Roland Ma (Attachments: #1 Supplement document: Attachment #1 towards my debt payment while in custody, #2 Supplement document: Recent bank statement, #3 Supplement document: Most recently one-time UDP payment received from City of Seattle on 10/29/2019)(Ma, Roland) |
| Filing 19 Second MOTION to Appoint Counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1), filed by Plaintiff Roland Ma. Noting Date 11/22/2019, (Ma, Roland) |
| Filing 18 DECLARATION of Galay C Tsui re #13 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Roland Ma (Ma, Roland) |
| Filing 17 DECLARATION of Jeremy Fu re #13 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Roland Ma (Ma, Roland) |
| Filing 16 DECLARATION of Bryson Chan re #13 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Roland Ma (Ma, Roland) |
| Filing 15 DECLARATION of Avis Poon re #13 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Roland Ma (Ma, Roland) |
| Filing 14 DECLARATION of Roland Ma re #13 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Roland Ma (Ma, Roland) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT re: dkt # 12 against defendant(s) City of Seattle, Seattle Police Department with JURY DEMAND, filed by Roland Ma.(Ma, Roland) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER requiring amended complaint and denying Plaintiff's #6 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)
|
| Filing 11 PRAECIPE to attach document per given instruction in document no. 2 re #6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Roland Ma (Attachments: #1 Application for Court-Appointed Counsel (Corrected))(Ma, Roland) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Plaintiff Roland Ma (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ma, Roland) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE: Plaintiff Roland Ma has registered to electronically file and receive electronic service in this case. (KB) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #7 Motion to Amend Parties and Case Caption. Because Mr. Ma is now the named plaintiff, the order directing Handsomeland LLC to associate counsel (Dkt. #5 ) is hereby VACATED. A bar order preventing Mr. Ma from filing any civil lawsuits in this district was entered in the case of Ma v. Dep't of Educ., C19-0399JCC, Dkt. # 92 at 2 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 23, 2019). Mr. Ma is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed as violative of that bar order. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(MW)(cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Amend Parties and Case Caption, filed by Plaintiff Handsomeland LLC. Noted by Clerk for 11/22/2019, (SWT) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff Handsomeland LLC is directed to appear in this action through counsel within thirty days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MW)(cc: Plaintiff via USPS)
|
| NOTICE Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 7.1, Plaintiff(s) must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement by 11/8/2019 (cc: plaintiff via US Mail). (SNP) |
| Filing 3 LETTER to Filer re: case number and Judge assignment, filed by Handsomeland LLC (cc: plaintiff via US Mail). (SNP) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Complaint and Application for Court-Appointed Counsel. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See attached letter for more information and instructions. Corrected signature page must be filed by 11/14/2019 (cc: plaintiff via US Mail). (SNP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) City of Seattle and Seattle Police Department with JURY DEMAND (Summons(es) not received to issue) (Receipt # SEA098515), filed by Handsomeland LLC. (Attachments: #1 Application for Court-Appointed Counsel, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (SNP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
