Palmer v. King County et al
| Gene Alfred Palmer, II |
| King County, Colleen Raftis, John Doe Raftis, John and Jane Does 1-50, King County Prosecutor's Office, US Attorney's Office, Seattle Police Department, Jane Doe Durkan and Jenny Durkan |
| 2:2019cv01777 |
| November 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Robert S Lasnik |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Declaration of Service of Summons, Complaint, and Evidence in Support, served on King County, King County Prosecutor's Office, Seattle Police Department, Jenny Durkan and Jane Doe Durkan her wife, US Attorney's Office, SPD Officer Colleen Raftis and Husband John Doe Raftis on 10/30/2019; filed by Plaintiff Gene Alfred Palmer, II. (MW)
|
|
Filing 5
EXHIBITS re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Gene Alfred Palmer, II (MW)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons(es) Issued in Paper Form as to defendant(s) All Defendants (cc: plaintiff via US Mail). (SNP)
|
|
Filing 2
LETTER to Filer re case number and Judge assignment (cc: plaintiff via US Mail). (SNP)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND (Summons(es) to be issued) (Receipt # SEA098525), filed by Gene Alfred Palmer, II. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Letter Requesting New Case) (SNP)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
