Gana v. BNSF Railway Company
Samantha Gana and Samantha R Gana |
BNSF Railway Company |
2:2019cv01919 |
November 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Mary Alice Theiler |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE of Summons upon defendant BNSF Railway Company mailed on 12/6/2019 (Mitchell, Wayne) |
Filing 3 ORDER re #2 Application for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The Court ADMITS Attorney Luke Pepper for Samantha R Gana, by Clerk William M McCool. No document associated with this docket entry, text only.NOTE TO COUNSEL: Local counsel agrees to sign all filings and to be prepared to handle the matter, including the trial thereof, in the event the applicant is unable to be present on any date scheduled by the court, pursuant to LCR 83.1(d).(CDA) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY Luke Pepper FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE for Plaintiff Samantha R Gana (Fee Paid) Receipt No. 0981-6028401 (Mitchell, Wayne) |
Hon. Mary Alice Theiler added. (GT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) BNSF Railway Company with JURY DEMAND (Receipt # 0981-6025138) Attorney Wayne Mitchell added to party Samantha Gana(pty:pla), filed by Samantha Gana. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mitchell, Wayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.