Walters v. Commissioner of Social Security
David Curtis Walters and David Walters |
Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Commissioner |
Social Security Administration |
2:2019cv01938 |
November 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Michelle L Peterson |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Mailing of Summons and Complaint to US Attorney Western Washington & OGC Social Security Administration on 12/4/2019, filed by Plaintiff David Walters. (Talbot, Charles) |
Filing 5 Summonses Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security, USAO (Attachments: #1 Summons OGC)(KMP) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against defendant Commissioner of Social Security (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by David Curtis Walters. (KMP) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (KMP) |
Filing 2 CONSENT by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Case remains assigned to Hon. Michelle L. Peterson. (TF) |
Hon. Michelle L. Peterson added. (SNP) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis , filed by David Curtis Walters. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Talbot, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.