Pearson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Danissa Kay Lewter Pearson
Defendant: Social Security Commissioner and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 2:2019cv01993
Filed: December 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Presiding Judge: Brian A Tsuchida
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2020 Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons and Complaint on United States Attorney's Office for the Western District of Washington on 1/27/2020, filed by Plaintiff Danissa Kay Lewter Pearson. (Gaddy, Jaclyn)
December 19, 2019 Filing 8 Summons(es) Electronically Issued as to defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (TF)
December 19, 2019 Filing 7 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Commissioner of Social Security (Receipt # IFP Granted), filed by Danissa Kay Lewter Pearson.(TF)
December 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Hon. Brian A Tsuchida. The Clerk shall issue summonses. (TF)
December 18, 2019 Filing 5 PRAECIPE to attach document re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Danissa Kay Lewter Pearson (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint)(Gaddy, Jaclyn)
December 9, 2019 Filing 4 CONSENT by all parties to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Case remains assigned to Hon. Brian A. Tsuchida. (TF)
December 9, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER: re #1 Complaint. Notice of Filing Deficiency** Action Required ** See attached letter for more information and instructions.Corrected signature page must be filed by 12/23/2019. (CDA)
December 9, 2019 Hon. Brian A Tsuchida added. (CDA)
December 6, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis , filed by Danissa Kay Lewter Pearson. (Attachments: #1 Summons Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gaddy, Jaclyn)
December 6, 2019 Filing 1 PROPOSED COMPLAINT against defendant(s) Social Security Commissioner, filed by Danissa Kay Lewter Pearson.(Gaddy, Jaclyn) (IFP Pending).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pearson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danissa Kay Lewter Pearson
Represented By: Jaclyn J Gaddy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Kerry Jane Keefe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?